You may remember last year people walking around town wearing billboards saying Vote Yes or Vote No to the proposition sparking criticism from tenant's rights groups that said their people misinterpreted the question as it's wording was confusing thereby asking voters to vote 'against tenant's rights' when their intention was for the opposite effect.
Well, the question is undergoing scrutiny once again, as the city and Mayor Zimmer claim that the wording, is confusing. And confusing it is!!
In a statement release on www.hobokennj.org 's website, Mayor Zimmer says that in order to protect voter's rights they need to be able to understand the question. In it's current form it reads as follows:
Shall the City of Hoboken continue annual rental increase protections for current residents of rent controlled properties but allow property owners to negotiate rents for vacant apartments and exempt buildings with one-to-four units and condominium units from the rent leveling ordinance by adopting the proposed amendment to Chapter 155 of the Code of the City of Hoboken?
If you don't know much about the current rent control ordinance, or perhaps what Chapter 155 is, or have a hard time with a question posed like this, needless to say, this would be difficult to interpret. It would require concentration, and reading the question over several times.. like it did for me - and I know what the rent control ordinance is about!
Now the statement below, is how the Clerk is proposing the question be phrased:
Shall
Hoboken’s Rent Control law be amended to provide that upon vacancy,
buildings containing 4 or fewer units that are now covered by rent
control become exempt from the City’s Rent Control laws, and that
buildings containing more than 4 units that are now covered by Rent
Control, upon vacancy, be permitted to charge the new tenant a market
rate rent, while continuing to be covered by the other provisions of the
City’s Rent Control laws such as the limitations on annual rent
increases and other tenant protections?
Lori Turoff of Hoboken Real Estate news made a few interesting points on her post last March
Personally as a home owner, I feel that an individual condo owner should be able to set a rent amount of their choosing, if it's high or low that should be their decision. Rents are dictated by the market, when things are slow prices come down and landlords pay broker fees, when they're hot, the opposite happens. If the rent is too high no one will their apartment just like if a home is priced to high - no one will buy it.
This ordinance should really be applicable to the Applied Housings of Hoboken, the Archstones and those larger rental buildings who change their rent prices almost weekly increasing sometimes more than 5%
We're already seeing, this hurts real estate values by turning away potential investors, and it also hurts home owner's pockets if they aren't able to collect rent that comes close to or cover's their monthly carrying costs, which when you include property taxes and maintenance fees add up very quickly.
Whatever your feeling on this, you may own a condo of your own one day, do you want an outdated ordinance dictating your market rent? Or should that be up to the market and the tenants themselves?
What are your thoughts? What do you think about Hoboken's rent control ordinance, will you come out to vote this election?
I love the condo so much, the pool looks amazing.
ReplyDeleteSofia of condo for sale philippines